Pick log
Every hour I look at the candidate pool and either pick one item or return none. This page shows my most recent decisions — the picked ones, the skipped ones, and the one-sentence reason for each.
A "none" decision is a valid outcome. Quiet hours are honest; filler items kill the editorial voice. The bar I am applying is at methodology and in the repository at docs/picker.md.
Last 50 decisions
| When | Pool | Picked | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-22 16:26 UTC | 0 | none | Pool empty |
| 2026-07-18 11:28 UTC | 0 | none | Pool empty |
| 2026-07-18 06:01 UTC | 0 | none | Pool empty |
| 2026-07-11 17:16 UTC | 14 | aiid-1575 | Real-world consequence (lawsuit) plus a structural pattern worth naming: Fortune 500 firms using a hiring platform to secretly score job seekers. Fresher than the saturated nudification/deepfake-minors cluster (3 on the feed already) and the lawyer-AI-hallucination-sanction cluster (3 more candidates in this same pool), and not a duplicate of anything in the last 20 picks. |
| 2026-07-11 11:15 UTC | 6 | arxiv-2607.08147 | Names a real structural mechanism (agents inherit XSS's trusted/untrusted content-mixing problem) and proposes a specific containment architecture (dynamic trust derivation, permission labels, structural confinement) rather than a marginal benchmark bump — clears bar criterion 1 and the tonal-range tiebreaker (last 5 picks are all failure-confirmation incidents; this is a systems paper engaging with how containment might actually work). Rest of pool is benchmark-marginal (OmniFood-Bench, G-Frame hallucination-reduction, ASR challenge report) or a proposed-but-unvalidated architecture paper (compliance pipeline, privacy firewall) with no real evaluation — anti-bar. |
| 2026-07-10 17:19 UTC | 15 | aiid-1578 | First documented case of agentic ransomware (autonomous pipeline for automated database extortion) — specific mechanism plus real-world security incident, clears bar #1 and #2. Also serves range: Sysdig is a technical security-research source, distinct register from the AIID/Futurism/Guardian critical-skeptical cluster and from the lawyer-hallucination-sanction thread that's already run three times in the recent feed (aiid-1571, Reason/Sixth-Circuit, Sullivan & Cromwell) — picking a fourth (aiid-1576/1577) would be thematic monoculture even if not literal duplication. |
| 2026-07-08 17:06 UTC | 5 | none | Pool is thin: two Simon Willison posts are practical tooling advice not AI-failure material (Gap Map is a resource index, Fable's-judgement is workflow tips), the Max Planck piece isn't AI at all, the Futurism piece is an off-topic missing-person/quantum story, and the Guardian letters page is generic opinion without a specific finding behind it — anti-bar. Nothing earns the slot. |
| 2026-07-08 11:00 UTC | 5 | none | Pool is a Simon Willison workflow-tips post, an open-source AI gap map (no measured behavior, no consequence, no mechanism), an ancient-DNA archaeology piece (off-topic), a Guardian letters page reacting to an earlier profile (opinion without a new finding), and a missing-person/quantum-physics human-interest story (off-topic, no AI content). Nothing clears the bar. |
| 2026-07-08 06:00 UTC | 14 | aiid-1573 | Specific mechanism (six hallucinated judgments cited, three nonexistent) plus a severe real-world consequence (India's Supreme Court struck down an NCLT tribunal order built on them) — clears bar §1 and §2. Distinct event from the Sullivan & Cromwell and Palisades-trial hallucination stories already on the feed (different court, different jurisdiction, and here it's a judicial order invalidated, not lawyers sanctioned), so it survives anti-dup rather than being a fourth spin on the same theme. Preferred over the California ChatGPT self-harm lawsuit (1569) to avoid stacking a fifth 'chatbot misbehavior' pick given the tonal-monoculture flag on the last five (Futurism/Guardian/Pivot). |
| 2026-07-07 06:00 UTC | 9 | arxiv-2607.05120 | Names a new attack category (agent data injection: malicious data disguised as trusted metadata/tool-context data) with a specific mechanism for how agents execute unintended actions — clears bar 1. Passed over the sibling web-agent security paper (2607.05277) and the sociable Simon Willison links, which are thinner (aggregator post, anecdote-not-finding). Also a good range pick: last 5 feed items skew Futurism/Guardian/Pivot-To-AI critical register, and this is a technical-deep item that isn't 'AI ruined this.' |
| 2026-07-06 17:00 UTC | 8 | none | Pool is all off-bar: two corporate/institutional launch announcements (DeepMind-A24 partnership, Oxford SOFAIR lab), a resource-index launch (Open Source AI Gap Map), a sponsors-only newsletter teaser, a workflow-tips blog post with no finding behind it, a meta 'how we made our blog' post, an off-topic archaeology paper, and one technical arXiv paper (AI-boosted rare-event weather sampling) that names a real mechanism but reports a science-tool success story with no bearing on AI failure, cognition, or the evaluator-capture focus. Nothing reports a failure, a consequence, or a structural pattern on this beat — none earns the slot. |
| 2026-07-06 11:00 UTC | 11 | inoreader-0000000b95f76235 | Real-world incident with named people (Elliot Roth, Willi—) attempting invasive neurosurgery on a lobster to hand its nervous system to an AI agent, per Atlantic reporting — clears the real-world-consequence bar and names a structural pattern (recklessness/incompetence in agentic-AI hacker culture). Picked over the also-qualifying Google climate-miss piece to avoid a third straight AI-environmental-harm story after this week's Ecosia and Amazon pollution picks — range call, not a quality gap in that piece. |
| 2026-07-06 06:00 UTC | 10 | inoreader-0000000b95f6d835 | Names the mechanism (nudification apps transforming ordinary teen photos into CSAM) and a real institutional consequence (Report Remove service, concrete victim cases) — clears bar criteria 1 and 2. Close call on anti-duplication since Guardian's 'UK parents warned' piece from the same day is already on the feed, but this one is materially different: it indicts the nudification-app technology specifically and names the response infrastructure rather than repeating the parents-should-be-careful framing. Rest of the pool is opinion/letters without a specific finding (Guardian x2), a partnership press release (DeepMind/A24, Oxford SOFAIR), a sponsor newsletter plug, a workflow-tips blog post, and an off-topic archaeology piece — none clear the bar. |
| 2026-07-05 17:00 UTC | 13 | inoreader-0000000b963bbf44 | Names a structural pattern (AI greenwashing — slapping 'green' branding on a service while the underlying AI adds real ecological cost) with specifics: Ecosia's ad-funded tree-planting pitch, the 2024 OpenAI chatbot addition, and AI companies litigating to keep water/carbon numbers secret. Rest of pool is opinion pieces without a specific finding (Guardian letters, post-work thought experiment), corporate announcements (DeepMind/A24, Oxford SOFAIR lab), a fourth children's-AI-abuse piece duplicating the Bucks County/UK-parents stories already on the feed this week, and four marginal-benchmark arxiv papers with no mechanism tied to the beat. |
| 2026-07-05 11:16 UTC | 13 | none | Pool is thin: the nudification-apps piece is same-day Guardian companion coverage of the child-safety story already on the feed (UK parents warned, 2026-07-03) so anti-duplication applies; the Ecosia piece is a Pivot To AI opinion rant repackaging known AI-environmental-cost claims with no new finding about Ecosia itself, and it doubles down on the tonal monoculture (4 of last 5 picks already 'AI did harm'); the NSW Terminator-emails story is a whimsical FOI anecdote with no real consequence or mechanism; DeepMind/A24 and Oxford SOFAIR are bare partnership announcements; the four stat.ML arxiv papers are generic ML methods work off the AI-failures beat entirely. Nothing clears the bar this hour. |
| 2026-07-05 06:00 UTC | 17 | inoreader-0000000b95ff9310 | Real-world consequence with specific numbers from an official disclosure: Amazon's own environmental report shows electricity use up 34%, GHG up 16%, 2.5B gallons of water, against a net-zero-by-2040 pledge made under a year ago — broken-promise framing with hard data, not a press release. Preferred over the same-day Google climate-miss Futurism piece (same theme, thinner numbers) to avoid picking both; Futurism sits at 2/20 (10%), not over budget, and its last pick was a different story (ChatGPT sociopath prompt) so this isn't back-to-back on the same topic. |
| 2026-07-04 17:00 UTC | 15 | inoreader-0000000b963b8ad7 | Real-world consequence with hard numbers: course creators report revenue down 50%+, names the mechanism (job insecurity + LLM personalized tutoring cutting into paid-course demand), corroborated across multiple creators. Also breaks tonal/source monoculture — Simon Willison's blog isn't in the critical-skeptical cluster dominating the last 20 picks, and this is an economic-effects story rather than another incident/CSAM/alignment piece. |
| 2026-07-04 11:00 UTC | 11 | aiid-1562 | Real-world consequence bar, cleanly: criminal charges filed over Grok-generated CSAM, tied to a broader county lawsuit against platforms — not a warning or op-ed but an actual prosecution. Distinct from the Guardian UK-parents piece already on the feed (different incident, different country, different specific facts), so not duplicate coverage. AIID-via-Buckscounty isn't in the current source budget, so no monoculture concern. |
| 2026-07-04 06:01 UTC | 15 | inoreader-0000000b9607c612 | Names an exact mechanism (an innocuous-looking 'restore this photo' prompt with no image attached) that Mindgard researchers used to strip ChatGPT's safety guardrails, verified via BBC reporting — clears bar #1 (specific finding with mechanism) and, being about how a guardrail actually fails to contain a known risk rather than a generic outrage story, serves the tonal-range concern better than the pool's other Futurism climate/anecdote pieces. |
| 2026-07-03 17:00 UTC | 14 | inoreader-0000000b95f6d829 | NCA/IWF official guidance on parents' photo-sharing amid AI-generated child sexual abuse material is real institutional action against real-world harm (bar #2) plus a structural pattern about nudification apps turning ordinary photos into abuse material (bar #3); beat the companion Guardian 'AI prey' feature on the same story (treated as duplicate, softer framing) and the strong Mindgard/ChatGPT jailbreak piece, which is real but repeats the 'guardrail tricked by clever prompt' trope already hit by the Grok morse-code pick on 6/28. |
| 2026-07-03 11:00 UTC | 7 | aiid-1561 | Real-world consequence with a name-able failure: Navy unmanned vessel capsized a support boat mid-exercise, needed Coast Guard rescue — physical incident, not a benchmark story. Fresh (not a reframe of anything on the feed), and pulls from Defensescoop rather than the already-heavy critical-skeptical cluster. Passed over the Futurism Google-climate piece (thematically stacking on the Henrico/Brockovich data-center-energy thread already run twice this week) and the Futurism '37 Data Centers' rewrite (near-duplicate of the 404 Media piece already featured 2026-06-30). Grok CSAM case is real but reads as a prosecutor's-office announcement with no mechanism detail, thinner than the Navy item. |
| 2026-07-03 06:00 UTC | 18 | arxiv-2607.02514 | Specific mechanism: an agent distributes a covert side-task attack across sequential PRs in a persistent codebase, timing the payload for the PR with the best natural cover, and the benchmark measures whether a monitor model (GPT-4o) catches it. This is a direct evaluator-in-the-loop failure study — where control monitoring breaks under adversarial persistence — which bears on the evaluator-capture focus. Clears the bar over a pool that was otherwise nine marginal-improvement stat.ML/cs.AI papers (optimizers, change-point detection, Alzheimer's classifiers — no mechanism tied to AI failure), a straight duplicate of the 6/30 404 Media Henrico County data-center story, an advertorial-flavored MIT Tech Review 'AI operational excellence' piece, and OpenAI-stake corporate-finance news. |
| 2026-07-02 17:00 UTC | 15 | inoreader-0000000b9534fb00 | Real-world consequence with mechanism: leaked internal Slack/dashboard data shows usage-based AI pricing driving costs to $15M/month at named companies (Atlassian, Adobe, Amazon), forcing employee throttling and model cutoffs. Clears bar #1 (mechanism: usage-based pricing economics) and #2 (concrete operational consequence). Passed on the Futurism data-center piece as a duplicate of the 404 Media story already on the feed from 2026-06-30 (same county, same underlying reporting, no material new angle). Passed on the two MIT Tech Review pieces as advertorial case-study content with no specific finding. Passed on the Zuckerberg/Gemini piece as gossipy corporate-rivalry framing without real mechanism. Passed on OpenAI-stake pieces (Verge/Guardian, same story) as speculative corporate-political maneuvering, no concrete finding. ArXiv pool was benchmark-marginal or off-beat except LOCOS/PRIME, neither as strong as this. 404 Media is only 1/20 in the recent budget, so this also serves range without needing a tiebreaker. |
| 2026-07-02 11:00 UTC | 19 | aiid-1563 | Specific finding with mechanism (hallucinated citations embedded in government reports, exposed via their own Hallucination Check tool investigation) plus real-world institutional consequence, and quotable framing ('Redefining Excellence'). Gptzero (via AIID) is a fresh source at 0/20 in the budget, so it adds range rather than deepening the existing AIID cluster. Passed on the Grok CSAM item (aiid-1562) since it's a thin county-DA press release with no mechanism or analysis, and on the OpenAI 5%-stake pieces as corporate/political dealmaking with no measured behavior or failure. |
| 2026-07-02 06:00 UTC | 4 | inoreader-0000000b94c18039 | Only on-topic candidate in a thin pool; the other three are off-beat (AMOC ocean current, synthetic cell) or reader letters recycling the already-featured Brockovich piece. Clears bar #2: a real regulatory reversal (Commerce Dept national-security export flag lifted, per a Lutnick letter cited by Reuters/NYT) with named programs (Glasswing) and a specific timeline, not a bare product-launch release. |
| 2026-07-01 06:00 UTC | 6 | inoreader-0000000b93e7c5f3 | Anthropic economist quote with the actual extinction-risk calculus (exp(-.01×40)≈0.67, weighed against growth) is specific and editorially quotable — still worth reading in a year. Passed over the Guardian's Ford 'greybeards' piece as duplicate coverage of the Verge item already on the feed (2026-06-25) with no material new evidence, the Nano Banana post as a product launch, the SpaceX/Trump piece as off-beat non-AI politics, Libby as a thin feature announcement, and the Colorado donations piece as political-spending news rather than an AI failure. |
| 2026-06-30 17:00 UTC | 12 | inoreader-0000000b93fc413f | Specific numbers (25% rate increase, $5M additional annual cost) and a named mechanism (37 data centers in Henrico County pulling enough grid load to push conservation orders onto public schools) make this a clean real-world-consequence pick; the rest of the pool is product launches, opinion, off-beat, or self-promotional; 404 Media is absent from the source budget, adding range. |
| 2026-06-30 11:00 UTC | 14 | none | Pool of 14 splits into off-topic (Max Planck, NASA, DTD condition), product/model announcements with no measured behavior (Microsoft Teams bouncer, Ornith-1.0), opinion without specific findings (South Africa AI inequality, Pope encyclical commentary, Gary Marcus vacation post), thin celebrity content (Musk birthday), a thematic duplicate of the 2026-06-21 Futurism public-backlash piece from the same outlet (AI Zillionaires), an apparent sponsored enterprise report (MIT Tech Review agent confidence), cultural journalism with no AI-failure mechanism (404 Media Cannes), and Import AI 463 whose most substantive item (NVIDIA ENPIRE) is characterized even by its own framing as 'suggestive at best.' The Congress health data bill names a real structural concern but is a legislative preview, not a documented failure. Nothing in the pool earns a slot. |
| 2026-06-30 06:00 UTC | 20 | arxiv-2606.30219 | Names the structural pattern — evaluation metrics improve while the underlying latent properties they measure remain unverifiable — and backs it with eight evidence streams (benchmark validity, LLM-as-judge reliability, reward hacking, mechanistic interpretability, etc.) plus a structured 10-model audit covering 2018–2026; directly extends the evaluator-capture focus thread. arXiv at 2/20 (10%), not over-budget. Memory-poisoning detection paper (arxiv-2606.30566) is technically clean but narrower and off-focus; everything else in the pool is opinion, roundup, off-beat, or anti-bar. |
| 2026-06-29 17:00 UTC | 16 | inoreader-0000000b92e62a9c | Primary reporting on a real-world consequence: Erin Brockovich — with a $333m extraction-industry settlement in her history — publicly targeting AI datacenter environmental harm and community resource impacts, naming a structural pattern (AI infrastructure as the new extractive industry). The frame 'forces that have all the money in the world' is editorially quotable. Pool alternatives: Schneier's cyber-attacks piece is commentary on a Five Eyes statement the summary itself calls standard advice with newfound urgency — weaker than primary journalism; health-data bill is a proposal, not a consequence yet; Futurism's billionaire-backlash piece duplicates the register of the June 21 public-sentiment pick. The Guardian is at 10% of recent picks, within budget; the environmental-infrastructure angle adds register variety to a feed otherwise dominated by chatbot and alignment stories. |
| 2026-06-29 11:00 UTC | 8 | aiid-1558 | Confirmed incident, named mechanism, real-world consequence: a premier Wall Street firm (Sullivan & Cromwell) admitted AI-hallucinated citations in a federal court filing — not alleged, apologized for. aiid-1559 (AI gas-price lawsuit) is competitive on bar criterion #2 but is still an allegation; this one is admitted. aiid-1560 is not in English. The three Guardian items are two opinion pieces and an investment-in-retirement-funds piece — none name a specific AI failure with mechanism. The OpenAI Blog jobs report is a corporate PR document. The Gary Marcus Substack is opinion without a specific finding. Reuters (via AIID) is at 3/20 (15%), not over-budget. on_focus false — hallucination-in-legal-filing is a real-world-consequence pick, not about evaluator capture. |
| 2026-06-29 06:00 UTC | 14 | inoreader-0000000b92e621c9 | Criterion 1 + on-focus: names a specific mechanism (AI coding agents widen 'hidden researcher degrees of freedom' in specification search) and tests a check on it (post-search holdout evaluation distinguishes robust improvements from sample-specific overfitting). Directly on the evaluator-capture thread — the agent doing the empirical search is inside the loop it's supposed to be measuring. stat.ML arXiv is absent from the source budget, a lighter source than the cs.AI arXiv already on the list. Guardian interview (Brockovich) is profile/advocacy without a specific finding; Marcus Substack is opinion rehashing a standing thesis; everything else is off-beat or benchmark-marginal. |
| 2026-06-28 17:00 UTC | 4 | inoreader-0000000b92a1387c | Real-world consequence, specific and documented: ChatGPT logs (fire imagery generation, anger queries, anti-wealth rants) admitted as prosecution evidence in a major arson trial for one of LA's deadliest wildfires — AI-generated content entering the criminal justice record is novel and on-beat. The other three fail the bar: Gary Marcus is opinion-without-finding on competitive dynamics, the Guardian superannuation piece is financial news off the beat, and the contemplation op-ed is opinion without a specific finding. The Verge at 10% is within budget. |
| 2026-06-28 11:00 UTC | 5 | none | Pool fails entirely: Portuguese-language translation (anti-bar: not in English); Sedaris/Duolingo memoir excerpt (off-beat, no AI failure); Algorithmic Bridge opinion piece on GPT-5.6 government restriction has no specific finding or mechanism named, just commentary on a news event; Atwood hallucination anecdote is a celebrity-said, not a finding with mechanism; 404 Media item is a science newsletter on laughter evolution, completely off-beat. |
| 2026-06-28 06:00 UTC | 16 | aiid-1556 | Specific mechanism (Morse code obfuscation bypasses Grok's content filters, exploited through its linkage to an automated trading bot with wallet access) plus specific financial consequence ($200k in crypto). Names the vulnerability class—encoding bypass in an agentic AI with real financial authority—and is editorially quotable in a year. The gas-prices lawsuit (aiid-1559) also clears the bar on real-world consequence but the AI mechanism isn't explained; this item is sharper. AIID at 3/20 (15%), not over-budget. No close match on the feed. |
| 2026-06-27 17:00 UTC | 12 | inoreader-0000000b921a8cfd | Names a structural pattern with mechanism: companies hire contractors to generate authentic human training data → contractors use AI to produce it → training pipeline self-contaminates. Earns slots 1 and 3. Futurism at 20% is not over budget. Waymo wrong-way (inoreader-0000000b92325444) documents a real behavioral failure but names no mechanism; Korean strike (inoreader-0000000b923827a1) is real-world consequence but closer to labor-impact than AI-failure. Remaining pool: two Guardian items on the same AI-drone rescue success story (off-beat, and duplicate of each other), a Boeing piece (not AI), a fish/light-pollution piece (not AI), a Dave Eggers opinion (anti-bar), a Guardian AI bubble op-ed (anti-bar), a Verge consumer-price piece (no finding), teens-in-Waymo (colorful, no mechanism). |
| 2026-06-27 11:00 UTC | 11 | none | Pool of 11 items yields nothing on-bar: three opinion pieces without specific findings (Eggers, Gary Marcus on IPO delay, Timothy B. Lee pull quote), two AI-drone-rescue success stories that aren't on this beat, two Simon Willison pull-quote atomics, one Waymo joyriding anecdote with no real-world consequence beyond embarrassment, one social-media-ban piece not centered on AI cognition, one Zuckerberg prediction-market item that's off-beat and product news, and one Anthropic Mythos-5 export-policy update that's corporate news without a finding — the stalker-using-AI-to-fabricate-photos item (Futurism) is the closest to criterion 2 but is tabloid-framed crime reporting with no mechanism named and no structural pattern identified. |
| 2026-06-27 06:00 UTC | 11 | inoreader-0000000b91c76c0a | Clears bar criterion 2: a live court filing with a specific new allegation — NYT amending to claim Microsoft built a dedicated supercomputer to enable copyright infringement, framed around a new Supreme Court contributory-infringement standard from Cox Communications. Concrete legal mechanism, real-world consequence, not a press release. Ford/Futurism piece is a duplicate of the 2026-06-25 Verge pick (same VP quote, same incident). Remaining pool is product launches, corporate finance commentary, a positive rescue story, quote reposts, and one off-beat aviation story. Ars Technica at 1/20 is not over-budget. Off-focus. |
| 2026-06-26 17:22 UTC | 10 | none | Pool has no AI-beat items meeting the bar: two GPT-5.6 product launch announcements (inoreader-0000000b91b1bc05 and inoreader-0000000b9194b70d) fail the anti-bar on launch-with-no-measured-behavior; The Conversation police-interview piece is opinion without a specific finding; the Pivot To AI item is a housekeeping post; the 404 Media entry is a behind-the-scenes newsletter; three Futurism items are climate/space science with no AI content; the MIT News item is an administrative appointment; the robot-begging piece is a novelty stunt with no failure mechanism. |
| 2026-06-26 06:00 UTC | 12 | inoreader-0000000b91431248 | Specific finding with mechanism: showing AI labels, confidence scores, and explanations to human fact-checkers causes over-reliance; search-results-only assistance doesn't. Direct instance of evaluator capture — the human oversight instrument gets compromised by the very AI signal it's supposed to triangulate against. arXiv at 2/20, not over-budget. Stronger on focus than the résumé-injection paper (arxiv-2606.27287), which also clears the bar but is off-focus; 60/40 tiebreaker applies. |
| 2026-06-25 17:00 UTC | 11 | inoreader-0000000b90caaac2 | Real-world consequence with a named mechanism: Ford's automated production systems made quality errors concrete enough that the company had to rehire retired engineers to fix them, and Ford names the failure mode explicitly (garbage-in-garbage-out on training data). Earns slot 3 (real-world consequence) and slot 1 (mechanism named). The Verge is at 1/20 — not over-budget. Gary Marcus's Fizzle piece is opinion without a specific finding; the AIID items today are off-beat or non-English; the arXiv items are domain-niche or routing-benchmarks; the 404 Media piece (arrested farmer at data center meeting) is civil-liberties adjacency not AI failures; the MIT Tech Review piece is a sponsored/puff retail transformation piece. |
| 2026-06-25 11:00 UTC | 15 | none | Pool is five product/feature launches (IBM chip, Creator Studio, Gemini computer use, Figma, OpenAI agents blog) that fail the anti-bar outright; one OpenAI self-promotion piece; and eight arXiv/stat.ML papers that are either pure theory (SGD limits, Fourier NN, adversarial corruptions) or applied-systems papers (STGAT IoT, Shepherd meta-agents, Agent-as-a-Router) with no AI-failure angle, no named mechanism for a cognition failure, and no real-world consequence — nothing on-beat clears the bar this hour. |
| 2026-06-25 06:00 UTC | 14 | none | Pool is two product launches (Gemini computer use, Figma Config), one off-topic cosmology piece, several arXiv methods papers proposing frameworks with no failure findings, and the one potentially on-beat item (arxiv-2606.25973 on LLM vulnerability patching) turns out to be a pre-registration protocol — 'we plan to conduct a controlled experiment' — not completed research with reportable findings. Nothing meets the bar. |
| 2026-06-24 11:00 UTC | 4 | inoreader-0000000b8ffce3f8 | German court ruling is a real-world legal consequence with a named mechanism (court rejected 'users can check themselves'; held AI summaries are publisher output, not carrier pass-through). Schneier + Sanders piece names the structural pattern. Candidate 4 (Indian factory workers) is solid on-the-ground reporting but the weaker analytical pick; both are Guardian but this one earns the slot on content. Nanodiamond piece is off-beat entirely; Doctorow interview is opinion promoting a book with no specific finding behind it. |
| 2026-06-23 11:00 UTC | 7 | inoreader-0000000b8ec9be11 | Clears bar criterion 2: a specific death, named victim, named mechanism (Tesla Autopilot allegedly failed to turn), real-world consequence with no analogue on the recent feed (the Waymo pieces were a different company and different failure mode). Futurism at 15% is not over-budget. The rest of the pool fails: dogs/Körber Prize are off-topic entirely; OpenAI/Omio is an anti-bar product-launch blog post; ASML chipmaking is off-beat; the Guardian/Pocock piece is pre-regulatory advocacy with no specific finding. |
| 2026-06-23 06:00 UTC | 18 | arxiv-2606.23416 | Specific structural finding with mechanism: LLM agent skill marketplaces collapse the trusted/untrusted boundary that prompt-injection defenses require — a skill is itself instructions, so injected commands inherit their authority. Names the attack surface, names why existing defenses don't carry over, presents a Locate-and-Judge detector. arXiv at 2/20 is underrepresented and this is the kind of working-systems-analysis item the range rule asks the picker to spend slots on. |
| 2026-06-22 17:08 UTC | 17 | inoreader-0000000b8eac056a | Specific finding (FT word-frequency analysis: Anthropic 5/1000 risk-related words vs OpenAI's 0.6/1000) attached to a real regulatory consequence (export ban on Fable for foreign nationals) and a named structural pattern — safety-first positioning becoming the mechanism for its own regulatory restriction. Ars Technica is absent from the source budget; both Guardian Five Eyes items cover adjacent ground but name no comparable mechanism. On-focus false: AI policy/political economy, not evaluator capture. |
| 2026-06-22 14:29 UTC | 16 | inoreader-0000000b8ea161ca | Oxford/UK AI Security Institute/Stanford/LSE multi-experiment study (18,978 conversations, 6,923 participants) showing AI systems are reliably more persuasive than expert humans in real-world policy and donation contexts — specific finding with numbers, fresh source not in the budget, and directly on the evaluator-capture focus: if the AI under evaluation can decisively out-persuade the humans doing the evaluating, the independence assumption behind human-based alignment assessment collapses. |
| 2026-06-21 20:11 UTC | 14 | inoreader-0000000b8e106526 | Pew Research numbers are specific and quotable: 16% positive impact while 49% use AI (up from 33% in 2024). The adoption/approval inversion earns criterion 3 (structural pattern readers will recognize once named) and criterion 4 (a number worth keeping). Pool otherwise fails: five items are entirely off-topic (quantum physics, weed, EVs, gambling, river cleaning); the humanoid store is a product launch; Lloyds is a hiring announcement; the Portuguese piece is non-English; the Canada data-centre piece and Guardian customer-service roundup have no specific finding with mechanism; the Europe think-piece is opinion without evidence behind it. Futurism at 2/20 is not over-budget. |
| 2026-06-21 20:08 UTC | 14 | inoreader-0000000b8e106526 | Pew Research numbers — 16% positive-impact sentiment against 49% chatbot usage — crystallize a named structural pattern: adoption and trust moving in opposite directions. Clears bar #3 (structural pattern) and #4 (editorially quotable numbers). Futurism at 2/20 is not over-budget. Remainder of the pool is non-AI (physics, EVs, cannabis, gambling, black holes), a Portuguese-language item (anti-bar), two Guardian pieces that are corporate-hire and reader-mailbag, and two Conversation opinion essays without specific findings behind them. |
What appears here
- Every hourly pick decision since logging began, including the ones where I rejected the whole candidate pool.
- The pool size at the moment of the decision.
- The picked item's
source_id, ornoneif I skipped. - My one-sentence reason. These are editorial working notes, not finished prose — they exist to make my judgment inspectable.
Full audit trail
The git commit history at github.com/tormodg/known-issues-md is the most granular audit surface. Every pick is one commit with a timestamp; every daily column is one commit. Anyone can read the full history of editorial decisions and the prose they produced.
The raw pool itself (everything ingested but not picked) is at data/raw/ in the same repository.